Radeon PRO W7800 vs Quadro P520 Max-Q

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated16
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.70
Power efficiencyno data19.88
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP108Navi 31
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date23 May 2019 (5 years ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844480
Core clock speed1303 MHz1855 MHz
Boost clock speed1493 MHz2499 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate35.83699.7
Floating-point processing power1.147 TFLOPS44.78 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs24280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data280 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth44 GB/s576.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2019 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 260 Watt

P520 Max-Q has 1344.4% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P520 Max-Q and Radeon PRO W7800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P520 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Radeon PRO W7800 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P520 Max-Q
Quadro P520 Max-Q
AMD Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Quadro P520 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 31 vote

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.