UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs Quadro P4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 with UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), including specs and performance data.

Quadro P4200
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 115 Watt
25.11
+726%

Quadro P4200 outperforms UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) by a whopping 726% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking196731
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.81no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGP104Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date7 May 2018 (6 years ago)28 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price$1526 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230432
Core clock speed1215 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate237.2no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P4200 and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed7132 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data
CUDA6.1no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
+686%
14
−686%
4K70−75
+678%
9
−678%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+760%
5−6
−760%
Battlefield 5 80−85 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70 no data
Forza Horizon 4 100−110 no data
Hitman 3 50−55 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100 no data
Metro Exodus 80−85 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+760%
5−6
−760%
Battlefield 5 80−85 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70 no data
Forza Horizon 4 100−110 no data
Hitman 3 50−55 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100 no data
Metro Exodus 80−85 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+760%
5−6
−760%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 100−110 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Hitman 3 30−33 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55 no data
Metro Exodus 45−50
+860%
5−6
−860%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+817%
6−7
−817%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22 no data
Hitman 3 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 no data
Metro Exodus 24−27 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24 no data

This is how Quadro P4200 and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is 686% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P4200 is 678% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.11 3.04
Recency 7 May 2018 28 May 2019
Chip lithography 16 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 12 Watt

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 55 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 354 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.