Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Quadro P4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200 Max-Q Quadro P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 with Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.

Quadro P4200
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
21.71
+146%

P4200 outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by a whopping 146% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking232456
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.18no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameGP104Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23044
Core clock speed1227 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1647 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate237.2no data
Floating-point processing power7.589 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs144no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1502 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
+140%
25
−140%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+946%
13
−946%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+183%
18−20
−183%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+182%
16−18
−182%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+124%
40−45
−124%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+1136%
11
−1136%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+183%
18−20
−183%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+152%
30−35
−152%
Fortnite 110−120
+160%
45−50
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+88%
50
−88%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+159%
27−30
−159%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+182%
16−18
−182%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+171%
30−35
−171%
Valorant 160−170
+77.2%
90−95
−77.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+124%
40−45
−124%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+946%
13
−946%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+155%
100−105
−155%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+155%
20−22
−155%
Dota 2 120−130
+169%
45−50
−169%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+225%
24
−225%
Fortnite 110−120
+105%
55−60
−105%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+141%
39
−141%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+159%
27−30
−159%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+473%
15
−473%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+182%
16−18
−182%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+174%
18−20
−174%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+171%
30−35
−171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+180%
24−27
−180%
Valorant 160−170
+77.2%
90−95
−77.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+124%
40−45
−124%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+155%
20−22
−155%
Dota 2 120−130
+169%
45−50
−169%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+152%
30−35
−152%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+213%
30
−213%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+182%
16−18
−182%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+171%
30−35
−171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+159%
27−30
−159%
Valorant 160−170
+77.2%
90−95
−77.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+160%
45−50
−160%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+148%
21−24
−148%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+129%
70−75
−129%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+207%
14−16
−207%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+191%
10−12
−191%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+270%
45−50
−270%
Valorant 200−210
+154%
80−85
−154%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+187%
21−24
−187%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+165%
20−22
−165%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+165%
21−24
−165%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+179%
14−16
−179%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+167%
21−24
−167%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+110%
21−24
−110%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+218%
10−12
−218%
Valorant 130−140
+151%
55−60
−151%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+200%
12−14
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Dota 2 75−80
+160%
30−33
−160%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

This is how Quadro P4200 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is 140% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 1136% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is ahead in 49 tests (82%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (18%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 21.71 8.83
Recency 21 February 2018 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm

Quadro P4200 has a 145.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
vs
RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
vs
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile
RX 560X AMD Radeon RX 560X
vs
RTX 6000 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RX 570X AMD Radeon RX 570X
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 24EUs UHD Graphics Xe 24EUs
535 Mobile AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
vs
Vega 3 Embedded Vega 3 Embedded
Quadro P4200 NVIDIA Quadro P4200
vs
RX 6700 RX 6700
Quadro P4200 NVIDIA Quadro P4200
vs
RX 6750 XT RX 6750 XT
Tesla V100 FHHL NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL
vs
RTX A6000 RTX A6000
RX Vega 20 Radeon RX Vega 20
vs
RTX 3080 Max-Q 3080 Max-Q
Pro Vega 20 AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
vs
RTX 2080 Ti RTX 2080 Ti
RX Vega 11 Efficient AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient
vs
GeForce MX230 GeForce MX230
Vega 3 Embedded AMD Radeon Vega 3 Embedded
vs
RX 5500 OEM RX 5500 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.6 59 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 10 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4200 or Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.