Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Quadro P4200

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 with Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.

Quadro P4200
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
21.69
+146%

P4200 outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by a whopping 146% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking226451
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.26no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameGP104Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23044
Core clock speed1227 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1647 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate237.2no data
Floating-point processing power7.589 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs144no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1502 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
+140%
25
−140%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 65−70
+171%
24−27
−171%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+946%
13
−946%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+183%
18−20
−183%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 65−70
+171%
24−27
−171%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+124%
40−45
−124%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+1136%
11
−1136%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+183%
18−20
−183%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+147%
30−35
−147%
Fortnite 110−120
+160%
45−50
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+88%
50
−88%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+159%
27−30
−159%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+171%
30−35
−171%
Valorant 160−170
+79.1%
90−95
−79.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 65−70
+306%
16
−306%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+124%
40−45
−124%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+946%
13
−946%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+155%
100−105
−155%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+155%
20−22
−155%
Dota 2 120−130
+169%
45−50
−169%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+229%
24
−229%
Fortnite 110−120
+105%
55−60
−105%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+141%
39
−141%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+159%
27−30
−159%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+473%
15
−473%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+174%
18−20
−174%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+171%
30−35
−171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+184%
24−27
−184%
Valorant 160−170
+79.1%
90−95
−79.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+124%
40−45
−124%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+155%
20−22
−155%
Dota 2 120−130
+169%
45−50
−169%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+147%
30−35
−147%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+213%
30
−213%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+171%
30−35
−171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+163%
27−30
−163%
Valorant 160−170
+79.1%
90−95
−79.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+160%
45−50
−160%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+148%
21−24
−148%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+129%
70−75
−129%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+207%
14−16
−207%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+191%
10−12
−191%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+270%
45−50
−270%
Valorant 200−210
+154%
80−85
−154%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+187%
21−24
−187%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+170%
20−22
−170%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+165%
21−24
−165%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+167%
14−16
−167%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+167%
21−24
−167%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+120%
20−22
−120%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+250%
10−11
−250%
Valorant 130−140
+151%
55−60
−151%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+200%
12−14
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Dota 2 75−80
+160%
30−33
−160%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Atomic Heart 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

This is how Quadro P4200 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is 140% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 1136% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is ahead in 44 tests (76%)
  • there's a draw in 14 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.69 8.81
Recency 21 February 2018 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm

Quadro P4200 has a 146.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 58 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 10 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4200 or Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.