GeForce 9500 GS vs Quadro P4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 with GeForce 9500 GS, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P4200
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
23.19
+4447%

P4200 outperforms 9500 GS by a whopping 4447% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2671290
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.850.98
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGP104G96
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)29 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230432
Core clock speed1227 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1647 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate237.28.800
Floating-point processing power7.589 TFLOPS0.088 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs14416
L1 Cache864 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz504 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s16.13 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.11.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P4200 23.19
+4447%
9500 GS 0.51

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P4200 10243
+4664%
Samples: 149
9500 GS 215
Samples: 222

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+6600%
2−3
−6600%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+4700%
1−2
−4700%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95
+4600%
2−3
−4600%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+6600%
2−3
−6600%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+7600%
1−2
−7600%
Fortnite 110−120
+5750%
2−3
−5750%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+4600%
2−3
−4600%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+7400%
1−2
−7400%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+4700%
1−2
−4700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+4550%
2−3
−4550%
Valorant 160−170
+5367%
3−4
−5367%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95
+4600%
2−3
−4600%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+6600%
2−3
−6600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+5020%
5−6
−5020%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
Dota 2 120−130
+5950%
2−3
−5950%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+7600%
1−2
−7600%
Fortnite 110−120
+5750%
2−3
−5750%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+4600%
2−3
−4600%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+7400%
1−2
−7400%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+8500%
1−2
−8500%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+4700%
1−2
−4700%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+5100%
1−2
−5100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+4550%
2−3
−4550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+6900%
1−2
−6900%
Valorant 160−170
+5367%
3−4
−5367%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+4600%
2−3
−4600%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
Dota 2 120−130
+5950%
2−3
−5950%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+7600%
1−2
−7600%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+4600%
2−3
−4600%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+4700%
1−2
−4700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+4550%
2−3
−4550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+6900%
1−2
−6900%
Valorant 160−170
+5367%
3−4
−5367%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+5750%
2−3
−5750%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+5500%
3−4
−5500%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 0−1
Metro Exodus 30−35 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+5733%
3−4
−5733%
Valorant 200−210
+4950%
4−5
−4950%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+6500%
1−2
−6500%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 50−55
+5300%
1−2
−5300%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+5600%
1−2
−5600%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 0−1
Metro Exodus 20−22 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 0−1
Valorant 130−140
+4533%
3−4
−4533%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Dota 2 75−80
+7700%
1−2
−7700%
Far Cry 5 27−30 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.19 0.51
Recency 21 February 2018 29 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 40 Watt

Quadro P4200 has a 4447.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

9500 GS, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9500 GS in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 9500 GS is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS
GeForce 9500 GS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 84 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 32 votes

Rate GeForce 9500 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4200 or GeForce 9500 GS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.