Radeon R9 285X vs Quadro P4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking185not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.36no data
Power efficiency20.01no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGP104Tonga
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 February 2017 (7 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$815 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922048
Core clock speed1202 MHz1002 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate165.8128.3
Floating-point processing power5.304 TFLOPS4.104 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs112128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB3 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1901 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s264.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2
HDMI-+
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan+1.2.170
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 200 Watt

Quadro P4000 has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P4000 and Radeon R9 285X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 285X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000
AMD Radeon R9 285X
Radeon R9 285X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 292 votes

Rate Quadro P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 8 votes

Rate Radeon R9 285X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.