GeForce RTX 5080 vs Quadro P4000

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4000 with GeForce RTX 5080, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P4000
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
25.91

RTX 5080 outperforms P4000 by a whopping 211% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1984
Place by popularitynot in top-10047
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.1840.40
Power efficiency19.4917.66
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGP104GB203
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 February 2017 (8 years ago)30 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$815 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RTX 5080 has 135% better value for money than Quadro P4000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores179210752
Core clock speed1202 MHz2295 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt360 Watt
Texture fill rate165.8879.3
Floating-point processing power5.304 TFLOPS56.28 TFLOPS
ROPs64112
TMUs112336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length241 mm304 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1901 MHz1875 MHz
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.4
CUDA6.110.1
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P4000 25.91
RTX 5080 80.49
+211%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P4000 11579
RTX 5080 35970
+211%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD68
−207%
209
+207%
1440p50−55
−222%
161
+222%
4K35−40
−214%
110
+214%

Cost per frame, $

1080p11.99
−151%
4.78
+151%
1440p16.30
−163%
6.20
+163%
4K23.29
−156%
9.08
+156%
  • RTX 5080 has 151% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 5080 has 163% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 5080 has 156% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
−208%
240−250
+208%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
−105%
300−350
+105%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−263%
220−230
+263%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
−208%
240−250
+208%
Battlefield 5 100−110
−84.1%
190−200
+84.1%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
−105%
300−350
+105%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−263%
220−230
+263%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−126%
200−210
+126%
Fortnite 130−140
−129%
300−350
+129%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−210%
300−350
+210%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
−170%
240−250
+170%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−58%
170−180
+58%
Valorant 180−190
−232%
600−650
+232%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
−208%
240−250
+208%
Battlefield 5 100−110
−84.1%
190−200
+84.1%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
−105%
300−350
+105%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−3%
270−280
+3%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−263%
220−230
+263%
Dota 2 130−140
−205%
400−450
+205%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−126%
200−210
+126%
Fortnite 130−140
−129%
300−350
+129%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−210%
300−350
+210%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
−170%
240−250
+170%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−105
−74%
170−180
+74%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−1.6%
65
+1.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−58%
170−180
+58%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
−409%
350−400
+409%
Valorant 180−190
−232%
600−650
+232%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−84.1%
190−200
+84.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−263%
220−230
+263%
Dota 2 130−140
−205%
400−450
+205%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−126%
200−210
+126%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−210%
300−350
+210%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−58%
170−180
+58%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
−588%
282
+588%
Valorant 180−190
−232%
600−650
+232%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
−129%
300−350
+129%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
−348%
290−300
+348%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
−163%
500−550
+163%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
−217%
160−170
+217%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−344%
173
+344%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 220−230
−119%
450−500
+119%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−155%
190−200
+155%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−390%
140−150
+390%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−200%
190−200
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−308%
300−350
+308%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−382%
236
+382%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
−119%
150−160
+119%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
−309%
90
+309%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−83.3%
55
+83.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
−240%
180−190
+240%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−421%
120−130
+421%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−449%
236
+449%
Valorant 160−170
−97.6%
300−350
+97.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−209%
130−140
+209%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−353%
130−140
+353%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−446%
70−75
+446%
Dota 2 85−90
−203%
270−280
+203%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−359%
150−160
+359%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−510%
300−350
+510%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−200%
95−100
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−147%
75−80
+147%

This is how Quadro P4000 and RTX 5080 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5080 is 207% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5080 is 222% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5080 is 214% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 5080 is 588% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5080 is ahead in 59 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.91 80.49
Recency 6 February 2017 30 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 360 Watt

Quadro P4000 has 260% lower power consumption.

RTX 5080, on the other hand, has a 210.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5080 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
GeForce RTX 5080

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 314 votes

Rate Quadro P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 886 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4000 or GeForce RTX 5080, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.