GeForce FX Go 5200 vs Quadro P4000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	171	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	25.91	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	no data
GPU code name	GP104	NV31M
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	6 February 2017 (7 years ago)	1 March 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$815	no data
Current price	$485 (0.6x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	5
Core clock speed	1202 MHz	1 MHz
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz	300 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	165.8	no data
Floating-point performance	5,304 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P4000 and GeForce FX Go 5200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	32 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7604 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	no data
Display Port	1.4	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	DDR
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.5	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	+	no data
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	6 February 2017	1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	32 MB
Chip lithography	16 nm	150 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---