HD Graphics P630 vs Quadro P400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Quadro P400
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
4.24
+36.8%

Quadro P400 outperforms HD Graphics P630 by a substantial 37% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking642721
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.790.02
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)
GPU code nameGP107Kaby-Lake-H-GT2
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2017 (7 years ago)5 August 2016 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119.99 no data
Current price$73 (0.6x MSRP)$1449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P400 has 3850% better value for money than HD Graphics P630.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25624
Core clock speed1228 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1252 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate20.0326.40
Floating-point performance679.9 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1740 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed4008 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth32.06 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.103
CUDA6.1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P400 4.24
+36.8%
HD Graphics P630 3.10

Quadro P400 outperforms HD Graphics P630 by 37% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P400 1642
+37.1%
HD Graphics P630 1198

Quadro P400 outperforms HD Graphics P630 by 37% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.24 3.10
Recency 7 February 2017 5 August 2016
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1740 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 15 Watt

The Quadro P400 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P400 is a workstation graphics card while HD Graphics P630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P400
Quadro P400
Intel HD Graphics P630
HD Graphics P630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 466 votes

Rate Quadro P400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 16 votes

Rate HD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.