GeForce GTX 670M vs Quadro P400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 670M GTX 670MX GTX 670MX SLI GTX 675M GTX 675M SLI GTX 675MX GTX 675MX Mac Edition

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P400 with GeForce GTX 670M, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P400
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
4.28

GTX 670M outperforms P400 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro P400 Quadro P400
GTX 670M GTX 670M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking688666
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.45no data
Power efficiency9.794.14
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGP107GF114
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 February 2017 (8 years ago)22 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256336
Core clock speed1228 MHz598 MHz
Boost clock speed1252 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate20.0333.49
Floating-point processing power0.641 TFLOPS0.8037 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs1656

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit192bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth32.06 GB/s72.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno dataUp to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 API
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P400 4.28
GTX 670M 4.53
+5.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P400 1648
GTX 670M 1745
+5.9%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P400 5625
GTX 670M 6486
+15.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p35−40
−11.4%
39
+11.4%
Full HD35−40
−17.1%
41
+17.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.43no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 91
+0%
91
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how Quadro P400 and GTX 670M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 670M is 11% faster in 900p
  • GTX 670M is 17% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.28 4.53
Recency 7 February 2017 22 March 2012
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro P400 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

GTX 670M, on the other hand, has a 5.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P400 and GeForce GTX 670M.

Be aware that Quadro P400 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 670M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P400
Quadro P400
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
GeForce GTX 670M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P400 Quadro P400
vs
FirePro W600 FirePro W600
GTX 670M GeForce GTX 670M
vs
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Quadro P400 Quadro P400
vs
GRID M40 GRID M40
Tesla M60 Tesla M60
vs
Arc A770 Arc A770
HD Graphics 5300 HD Graphics 5300
vs
HD Graphics 4200 HD Graphics 4200
ATI HD 5570 Radeon HD 5570
vs
RTX 4060 Ti RTX 4060 Ti
HD 7790 Radeon HD 7790
vs
RX 5300 RX 5300
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
vs
T1200 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q
GTX 1080 GeForce GTX 1080
vs
GT 730A GT 730A
HD 7660G Radeon HD 7660G
vs
HD Graphics 510 HD Graphics 510
HD 6770M Radeon HD 6770M
vs
GTX 1650 GTX 1650
RX 480 Radeon RX 480
vs
GT 730M GT 730M
HD 6770M Radeon HD 6770M
vs
R4 Graphics R4 Graphics

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 495 votes

Rate Quadro P400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 92 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 670M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P400 or GeForce GTX 670M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.