Radeon RX 6800 XT vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200 Max-Q Quadro P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile
VS
Radeon RX 5900 Radeon RX 5900 XT Radeon RX 5950 Radeon RX 5950 XT Radeon RX 6800 Radeon RX 6800 XT Radeon RX 6850 XT Radeon RX 6900 Radeon RX 6900 XT Radeon RX 6900 XTX Radeon RX 6950 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3200 Max-Q with Radeon RX 6800 XT, including specs and performance data.

P3200 Max-Q
2018
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
22.80

RX 6800 XT outperforms P3200 Max-Q by a whopping 175% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

P3200 Max-Q P3200 Max-Q
RX 6800 XT RX 6800 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking24631
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data50.67
Power efficiency21.7214.95
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP104Navi 21
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)28 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17924608
Core clock speed1139 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed1404 MHz2250 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate157.2648.0
Floating-point processing power5.032 TFLOPS20.74 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs112288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P3200 Max-Q 22.80
RX 6800 XT 62.76
+175%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P3200 Max-Q 9077
RX 6800 XT 24988
+175%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70−75
−190%
203
+190%
1440p50−55
−190%
145
+190%
4K35−40
−186%
100
+186%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.20
1440pno data4.48
4Kno data6.49

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 404
+0%
404
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 127
+0%
127
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 122
+0%
122
+0%
Valorant 401
+0%
401
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Dota 2 155
+0%
155
+0%
Far Cry 5 58
+0%
58
+0%
Fortnite 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 355
+0%
355
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 150
+0%
150
+0%
Metro Exodus 120
+0%
120
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 129
+0%
129
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 173
+0%
173
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Dota 2 145
+0%
145
+0%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 302
+0%
302
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 356
+0%
356
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Dota 2 120
+0%
120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 120
+0%
120
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 83
+0%
83
+0%
World of Tanks 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 222
+0%
222
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 112
+0%
112
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 278
+0%
278
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 134
+0%
134
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 134
+0%
134
+0%
Metro Exodus 56
+0%
56
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 53
+0%
53
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 134
+0%
134
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 122
+0%
122
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 133
+0%
133
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 153
+0%
153
+0%

This is how P3200 Max-Q and RX 6800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800 XT is 190% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT is 190% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800 XT is 186% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 22.80 62.76
Recency 21 February 2018 28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 300 Watt

P3200 Max-Q has 300% lower power consumption.

RX 6800 XT, on the other hand, has a 175.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P3200 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6800 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Radeon RX 6800 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
Pro 5600M Radeon Pro 5600M
RX 6800 XT Radeon RX 6800 XT
vs
RTX 3080 GeForce RTX 3080
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Max-Q
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
Tesla K40t K40t
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2050 Mobile
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
A800 PCIe 40 GB PCIe 40 GB
M5000 SE Quadro M5000 SE
vs
PRO W7700 PRO W7700
RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 5000
vs
Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU Max 30-Core GPU
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
vs
RX 6800S RX 6800S
Pro WX Vega M GL Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
vs
R7 M350 R7 M350
Pro WX Vega M GL Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
vs
Iris Xe MAX Graphics Xe MAX Graphics
Pro WX Vega M GL Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
vs
Iris Xe Graphics MAX Xe Graphics MAX
Pro WX Vega M GL Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
vs
Vega 7 Vega 7

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.7 21 vote

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3690 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.