Radeon RX 5900 vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking292not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.23no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGP104Navi 21
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17924096
Core clock speed1139 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1404 MHz1635 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million21,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate157.2418.6
Floating-point processing power5.032 TFLOPS13.39 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs112256
L1 Cache672 KBno data
L2 Cache1536 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB12 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 300 Watt

P3200 Max-Q has 300% lower power consumption.

RX 5900, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P3200 Max-Q and Radeon RX 5900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 5900 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
AMD Radeon RX 5900
Radeon RX 5900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 27 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 16 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3200 Max-Q or Radeon RX 5900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.