Radeon RX 6400 vs Quadro P3000 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	270	268
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	9.83	12.30
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	N17E-Q1	Navi 24
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	11 January 2017 (7 years ago)	19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$159
Current price	$537	$376 (2.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6400 has 25% better value for money than P3000 Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	768
Core clock speed	1088 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1215 MHz	2321 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	53 Watt
Texture fill rate	97.20	111.4
Floating-point performance	3,110 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P3000 Mobile and Radeon RX 6400 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x4
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	168 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+
Display Port	1.4	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	6.1	no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	62 +3.3%	60−65 −3.3%
4K	29 +7.4%	27−30 −7.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35
+3.3%

30−33

−3.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +11.4%	35−40 −11.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +5%	60−65 −5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +5%	40−45 −5%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +8.9%	45−50 −8.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +8%	50−55 −8%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +5%	60−65 −5%
Hitman 3	45−50 +2.2%	45−50 −2.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +5%	60−65 −5%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +5.5%	55−60 −5.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +6%	50−55 −6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +1.8%	55−60 −1.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +2.9%	35−40 −2.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +11.4%	35−40 −11.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +5%	60−65 −5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +5%	40−45 −5%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +8.9%	45−50 −8.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +8%	50−55 −8%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +5%	60−65 −5%
Hitman 3	45−50 +2.2%	45−50 −2.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +5%	60−65 −5%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +5.5%	55−60 −5.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +6%	50−55 −6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +1.8%	55−60 −1.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	63 +5%	60−65 −5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +2.9%	35−40 −2.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +11.4%	35−40 −11.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +5%	40−45 −5%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +8.9%	45−50 −8.9%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +5%	60−65 −5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +5%	60−65 −5%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +5.5%	55−60 −5.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	33 +10%	30−33 −10%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +2.9%	35−40 −2.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55
+6%

50−55

−6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +8.6%	35−40 −8.6%
Hitman 3	27−30 +3.7%	27−30 −3.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +6.7%	30−33 −6.7%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +11.4%	35−40 −11.4%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +2.9%	35−40 −2.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +11.4%	35−40 −11.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	35−40 +11.4%	35−40 −11.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Hitman 3	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +8.3%	24−27 −8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18
+6.3%

16−18

−6.3%

This is how P3000 Mobile and RX 6400 compete in popular games:

P3000 Mobile is 3% faster in 1080p
P3000 Mobile is 7% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.32	19.52
Recency	11 January 2017	19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	53 Watt