ATI Radeon 9250 PCI vs Quadro P3000 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking319not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.63no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGP104RV280
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years ago)1 March 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed1088 MHz240 MHz
Boost clock speed1215 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate97.200.96
Floating-point processing power3.11 TFLOPSno data
ROPs484
TMUs804

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount6 GB128 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth168 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX128.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.51.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 January 2017 1 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 150 nm

P3000 Mobile has an age advantage of 12 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 837.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P3000 Mobile and Radeon 9250 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 9250 PCI is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
Quadro P3000 Mobile
ATI Radeon 9250 PCI
Radeon 9250 PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 156 votes

Rate Quadro P3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon 9250 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.