L4 vs Quadro P2200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P2200 and L4, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro P2200
2019
5 GB GDDR5X, 75 Watt
22.36

L4 outperforms P2200 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking268260
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.7124.13
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP106AD104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 June 2019 (6 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12807424
Core clock speed1000 MHz795 MHz
Boost clock speed1493 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt72 Watt
Texture fill rate119.4489.6
Floating-point processing power3.822 TFLOPS30.29 TFLOPS
ROPs4080
TMUs80240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length201 mm169 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount5 GB24 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz1563 MHz
Memory bandwidth200.2 GB/s300.1 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P2200 22.36
L4 22.81
+2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P2200 9372
L4 9559
+2%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P2200 32346
L4 140842
+335%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro P2200 31244
L4 116491
+273%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.36 22.81
Recency 10 June 2019 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 72 Watt

L4 has a 2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 380% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 4.2% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P2200 and L4.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200
NVIDIA L4
L4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 428 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 43 votes

Rate L4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P2200 or L4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.