Radeon RX 7600 XT vs Quadro P2000

Place in performance ranking	278	66
Place by popularity	not in top-100	69
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	14.15	29.82
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	GP106	Navi 33
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	6 February 2017 (7 years ago)	8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$585	$329
Current price	$371 (0.6x MSRP)	$477 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7600 XT has 111% better value for money than Quadro P2000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	2048
Core clock speed	1076 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz	2755 MHz
Number of transistors	4,400 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	94.72	352.6
Floating-point performance	3,031 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	201 mm	204 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	160 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	140.2 GB/s	288.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P2000 18.82

RX 7600 XT 45.10
+140%

Radeon RX 7600 XT outperforms Quadro P2000 by 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P2000 7268

RX 7600 XT 17418
+140%

Radeon RX 7600 XT outperforms Quadro P2000 by 140% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	60 −133%	140−150 +133%
1440p	23 −139%	55−60 +139%
4K	19 −137%	45−50 +137%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−33

−133%

70−75
+133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −130%	85−90 +130%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −134%	75−80 +134%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −126%	140−150 +126%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −137%	90−95 +137%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −133%	70−75 +133%
Far Cry 5	42 −138%	100−105 +138%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −135%	120−130 +135%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 −133%	200−210 +133%
Hitman 3	35−40 −130%	85−90 +130%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −130%	170−180 +130%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −138%	150−160 +138%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −131%	120−130 +131%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 −130%	140−150 +130%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −128%	130−140 +128%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −130%	85−90 +130%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −134%	75−80 +134%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −126%	140−150 +126%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −137%	90−95 +137%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −133%	70−75 +133%
Far Cry 5	33 −127%	75−80 +127%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −135%	120−130 +135%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 −133%	200−210 +133%
Hitman 3	35−40 −130%	85−90 +130%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −130%	170−180 +130%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −138%	150−160 +138%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −131%	120−130 +131%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 −130%	140−150 +130%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	38 −137%	90−95 +137%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −128%	130−140 +128%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −130%	85−90 +130%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −134%	75−80 +134%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −137%	90−95 +137%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −133%	70−75 +133%
Far Cry 5	26 −131%	60−65 +131%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 −133%	200−210 +133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −130%	170−180 +130%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 −130%	140−150 +130%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	25 −120%	55−60 +120%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −128%	130−140 +128%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55
−131%

120−130

+131%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −136%	85−90 +136%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −130%	85−90 +130%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −137%	45−50 +137%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −135%	40−45 +135%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −129%	55−60 +129%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
Far Cry 5	21 −138%	50−55 +138%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −130%	85−90 +130%
Hitman 3	21−24 −127%	50−55 +127%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −137%	90−95 +137%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −129%	80−85 +129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −137%	90−95 +137%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −138%	50−55 +138%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −131%	30−33 +131%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−126%

70−75
+126%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −122%	40−45 +122%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −114%	30−33 +114%
Hitman 3	14−16 −114%	30−33 +114%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −138%	50−55 +138%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −125%	27−30 +125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13 −131%	30−33 +131%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −110%	21−24 +110%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −110%	21−24 +110%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Far Cry 5	7 −129%	16−18 +129%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −131%	60−65 +131%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −138%	50−55 +138%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −122%	40−45 +122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

−135%

40−45
+135%

This is how Quadro P2000 and RX 7600 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7600 XT is 133% faster in 1080p
RX 7600 XT is 139% faster in 1440p
RX 7600 XT is 137% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	18.82	45.10
Recency	6 February 2017	8 January 2024
Cost	$585	$329
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	190 Watt