GeForce GTX 1630 vs Quadro P2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Quadro P2000
2017
5 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
18.79
+45.7%

Quadro P2000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1630 by a considerable 46% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking279364
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.9012.70
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGP106TU117
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 February 2017 (7 years ago)28 June 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$585 no data
Current price$371 (0.6x MSRP)$213

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P2000 has 9% better value for money than GTX 1630.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024512
Core clock speed1076 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate94.7257.12
Floating-point performance3,031 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length201 mm145 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount5 GB4 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth140.2 GB/s96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P2000 18.79
+45.7%
GTX 1630 12.90

Quadro P2000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1630 by 46% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P2000 7268
+45.6%
GTX 1630 4991

Quadro P2000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1630 by 46% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD57
+62.9%
35−40
−62.9%
1440p22
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
4K20
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+55%
40−45
−55%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+51.9%
27−30
−51.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 42
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+55%
40−45
−55%
Hitman 3 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+52.5%
40−45
−52.5%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+62.9%
35−40
−62.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+55%
40−45
−55%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+51.9%
27−30
−51.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 72
+60%
45−50
−60%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+55%
40−45
−55%
Hitman 3 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+52.5%
40−45
−52.5%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+62.9%
35−40
−62.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+51.9%
27−30
−51.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 26
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+55%
40−45
−55%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+52.5%
40−45
−52.5%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+62.9%
35−40
−62.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%
Hitman 3 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Far Cry 5 21
+50%
14−16
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Hitman 3 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%

This is how Quadro P2000 and GTX 1630 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P2000 is 63% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P2000 is 57% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P2000 is 67% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.79 12.90
Recency 6 February 2017 28 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm

The Quadro P2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
GeForce GTX 1630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 548 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1141 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.