GeForce GTX 1630 vs P102-100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared P102-100 with GeForce GTX 1630, including specs and performance data.

P102-100
2018
5 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
7.46

GTX 1630 outperforms P102-100 by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking557442
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.97no data
Power efficiency2.4112.15
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP102TU117
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 February 2018 (7 years ago)28 June 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3200512
Core clock speed1582 MHz1740 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate336.657.12
Floating-point processing power10.77 TFLOPS1.828 TFLOPS
ROPs8016
TMUs20032
L1 Cache1.2 MB512 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm145 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount5 GB4 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1376 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth440.3 GB/s96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P102-100 7.46
GTX 1630 11.28
+51.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P102-100 3300
Samples: 4
GTX 1630 4985
+51.1%
Samples: 203

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.46 11.28
Recency 12 February 2018 28 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 75 Watt

P102-100 has a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1630, on the other hand, has a 51.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1630 is our recommended choice as it beats the P102-100 in performance tests.

Be aware that P102-100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1630 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA P102-100
P102-100
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
GeForce GTX 1630

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 36 votes

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1453 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about P102-100 or GeForce GTX 1630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.