Radeon R9 380X vs Quadro P2000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P2000 Mobile with Radeon R9 380X, including specs and performance data.

P2000 Mobile
2019
3.75 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.03

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking330329
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.97
Power efficiency14.805.84
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGP106Antigua
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date15 February 2019 (5 years ago)19 November 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11522048
Compute unitsno data32
Core clock speed1291 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1291 MHz970 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate92.95124.2
Floating-point processing power2.974 TFLOPS3.973 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs72128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data221 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data​2 x 6-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)no data-
Maximum RAM amount3.75 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz970 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s182.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
Number of Eyefinity displaysno data6
HDMI-+
DisplayPort support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
LiquidVR-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
ZeroCore-+
VCE-+
DDMA audiono data+
Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2+
Mantle-+
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P2000 Mobile 16.03
R9 380X 16.03

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

P2000 Mobile 6847
R9 380X 9510
+38.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 February 2019 19 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount 3.75 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 190 Watt

P2000 Mobile has an age advantage of 3 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 153.3% lower power consumption.

R9 380X, on the other hand, has a 6.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P2000 Mobile and Radeon R9 380X.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon R9 380X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
Quadro P2000 Mobile
AMD Radeon R9 380X
Radeon R9 380X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 105 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 181 vote

Rate Radeon R9 380X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.