Radeon Pro W6600M vs Quadro P2000 Mobile

Place in the ranking	348	207
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	14.41	20.94
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GP106	Navi 23
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	15 February 2019 (5 years ago)	8 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1152	1792
Core clock speed	1291 MHz	1224 MHz
Boost clock speed	1291 MHz	2034 MHz
Number of transistors	4,400 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	90 Watt
Texture fill rate	92.95	227.8
Floating-point processing power	2.974 TFLOPS	7.29 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64
TMUs	72	112
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	3.75 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96.13 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	6.1	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Valorant	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Dota 2	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Fortnite	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Valorant	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
World of Tanks	260−270 +0%	260−270 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Dota 2	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Valorant	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
World of Tanks	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Valorant	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Dota 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Dota 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Fortnite	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Valorant	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.99	26.13
Recency	15 February 2019	8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount	3.75 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	90 Watt

P2000 Mobile has 20% lower power consumption.

Pro W6600M, on the other hand, has a 74.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 113.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 Mobile in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.