GeForce GTX 750 vs Quadro P2000 Mobile
Aggregated performance score
Quadro P2000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 750 by 95% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 300 | 460 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 84 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.33 | 0.83 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Maxwell (2014−2018) |
| GPU code name | GP107GL | GM107 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 July 2017 (6 years ago) | 18 February 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $119 |
| Current price | $1477 | $340 (2.9x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
P2000 Mobile has 301% better value for money than GTX 750.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 512 |
| CUDA cores | no data | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,300 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Texture fill rate | 77.14 | 34.72 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 1,111 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Quadro P2000 Mobile and GeForce GTX 750 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Bus support | no data | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Height | no data | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.13 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI |
| Multi monitor support | no data | 3 displays |
| HDMI | no data | + |
| HDCP | no data | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
| Audio input for HDMI | no data | Internal |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Blu Ray 3D | no data | + |
| 3D Gaming | no data | + |
| 3D Vision | no data | + |
| Optimus | + | no data |
| 3D Vision Live | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Quadro P2000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 750 by 95% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Quadro P2000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 750 by 72% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 16.87 | 8.66 |
| Recency | 5 July 2017 | 18 February 2014 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 55 Watt |
The Quadro P2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 750 in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro P2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 750 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
