FirePro W9000 vs Quadro P2000 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro P2000 Mobile with FirePro W9000, including specs and performance data.
W9000 outperforms P2000 Mobile by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 401 | 395 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.40 |
| Power efficiency | 14.70 | 4.13 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | GP106 | Tahiti |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 February 2019 (7 years ago) | 14 June 2012 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $3,999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1152 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1291 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1291 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,400 million | 4,313 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 92.95 | 124.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.974 TFLOPS | 3.994 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 72 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 432 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1280 KB | 768 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Bus support | no data | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 279 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Form factor | no data | full height / full length |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3.75 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1502 MHz | 1375 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.13 GB/s | 264 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
| StereoOutput3D | - | + |
| Dual-link DVI support | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.32 | 14.69 |
| Recency | 15 February 2019 | 14 June 2012 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3.75 GB | 6 GB |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 350 Watt |
P2000 Mobile has an age advantage of 6 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 367% lower power consumption.
FirePro W9000, on the other hand, has a 3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P2000 Mobile and FirePro W9000.
Be aware that Quadro P2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while FirePro W9000 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
