Quadro K2000 vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q

Place in the ranking	379	696
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.44
Power efficiency	no data	5.56
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GP107GL	GK107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	5 July 2017 (7 years ago)	1 March 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	384
Core clock speed	1215 MHz	954 MHz
Boost clock speed	1468 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	51 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	30.53
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.7327 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	16
TMUs	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	202 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	no data	5.1
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	-	+
CUDA	-	3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P2000 Max-Q 13.81
+236%

Quadro K2000 4.11

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P2000 Max-Q 5309
+236%

Quadro K2000 1580

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	50 +257%	14−16 −257%
4K	22 +267%	6−7 −267%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	42.79
4K	no data	99.83

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +257%	7−8 −257%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +238%	8−9 −238%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +275%	12−14 −275%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +257%	7−8 −257%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +238%	8−9 −238%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +250%	16−18 −250%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +260%	10−11 −260%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +280%	10−11 −280%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +240%	10−11 −240%
Valorant	55−60 +244%	16−18 −244%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +275%	12−14 −275%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +257%	7−8 −257%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +238%	8−9 −238%
Dota 2	50−55 +257%	14−16 −257%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +271%	14−16 −271%
Fortnite	75−80 +271%	21−24 −271%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +250%	16−18 −250%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +260%	10−11 −260%
Grand Theft Auto V	50−55 +257%	14−16 −257%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +280%	10−11 −280%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 +237%	30−33 −237%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +240%	10−11 −240%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +250%	12−14 −250%
Valorant	55−60 +244%	16−18 −244%
World of Tanks	180−190 +266%	50−55 −266%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +275%	12−14 −275%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +257%	7−8 −257%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +238%	8−9 −238%
Dota 2	50−55 +257%	14−16 −257%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +271%	14−16 −271%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +250%	16−18 −250%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +260%	10−11 −260%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 +237%	30−33 −237%
Valorant	55−60 +244%	16−18 −244%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 +270%	30−33 −270%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
World of Tanks	95−100 +259%	27−30 −259%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +250%	8−9 −250%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +267%	9−10 −267%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +240%	10−11 −240%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 +250%	6−7 −250%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +275%	8−9 −275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%
Valorant	30−35 +240%	10−11 −240%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Dota 2	24−27 +257%	7−8 −257%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 +243%	7−8 −243%
Metro Exodus	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 +242%	12−14 −242%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +243%	7−8 −243%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Dota 2	24−27 +257%	7−8 −257%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%
Fortnite	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Forza Horizon 5	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Valorant	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%

This is how P2000 Max-Q and Quadro K2000 compete in popular games:

P2000 Max-Q is 257% faster in 1080p
P2000 Max-Q is 267% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.81	4.11
Recency	5 July 2017	1 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm

P2000 Max-Q has a 236% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Quadro K2000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.