Radeon RX 6600 XT vs Quadro P1000

Place in performance ranking	381	79
Place by popularity	not in top-100	51
Value for money	7.42	47.22
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GP107	Navi 23
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 February 2017 (7 years old)	30 July 2021 (2 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	$375	$379
Current price	$301 (0.8x MSRP)	$283 (0.7x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6600 XT has 536% better value for money than Quadro P1000.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	2048
Core clock speed	1493 MHz	1968 MHz
Boost clock speed	1519 MHz	2589 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	160 (TGP) Watt
Texture fill rate	59.20	331.4
Floating-point performance	1,894 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	145 mm	190 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P1000 11.49

RX 6600 XT 42.56
+270%

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Quadro P1000 by 270% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P1000 4450

RX 6600 XT 16484
+270%

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Quadro P1000 by 270% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P1000 24240

RX 6600 XT 88163
+264%

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Quadro P1000 by 264% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P1000 6001

RX 6600 XT 39051
+551%

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Quadro P1000 by 551% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P1000 4787

RX 6600 XT 28342
+492%

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Quadro P1000 by 492% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P1000 30721

RX 6600 XT 156297
+409%

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Quadro P1000 by 409% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	45 −193%	132 +193%
1440p	18−20 −311%	74 +311%
4K	11 −273%	41 +273%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20

−339%

79
+339%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −208%	70−75 +208%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −617%	129 +617%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −208%	120−130 +208%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −290%	110−120 +290%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −333%	78 +333%
Far Cry 5	32 −372%	151 +372%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −323%	131 +323%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −212%	120−130 +212%
Hitman 3	30−33 −637%	221 +637%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −471%	137 +471%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −245%	65−70 +245%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −592%	166 +592%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −471%	120 +471%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −208%	70−75 +208%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −489%	106 +489%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −208%	120−130 +208%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −290%	110−120 +290%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −322%	76 +322%
Far Cry 5	29 −386%	141 +386%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −310%	127 +310%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −212%	120−130 +212%
Hitman 3	30−33 −510%	183 +510%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −354%	109 +354%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −459%	95 +459%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −245%	65−70 +245%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −492%	142 +492%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30 −487%	176 +487%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −395%	104 +395%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −208%	70−75 +208%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −317%	75 +317%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −208%	120−130 +208%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −283%	69 +283%
Far Cry 5	27 −393%	133 +393%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −261%	112 +261%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −212%	120−130 +212%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16 −519%	99 +519%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −190%	61 +190%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −324%	70−75 +324%
Hitman 3	18−20 −522%	112 +522%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −347%	76 +347%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −460%	56 +460%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −460%	84 +460%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −318%	45−50 +318%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −600%	56 +600%
Battlefield 5	21−24 −319%	85−90 +319%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −567%	40 +567%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −483%	105 +483%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 −390%	98 +390%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −314%	90−95 +314%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −482%	60−65 +482%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −633%	44 +633%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −400%	40−45 +400%
Hitman 3	10−12 −418%	57 +418%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −122%	20 +122%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −580%	34 +580%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −283%	21−24 +283%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −567%	40 +567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −440%	54 +440%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −460%	28 +460%
Battlefield 5	10−11 −420%	50−55 +420%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −600%	14 +600%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −467%	51 +467%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −342%	53 +342%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −300%	60−65 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −500%	24 +500%

This is how Quadro P1000 and RX 6600 XT compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

RX 6600 XT is 193% faster than Quadro P1000

1440p resolution:

RX 6600 XT is 311% faster than Quadro P1000

4K resolution:

RX 6600 XT is 273% faster than Quadro P1000

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Hitman 3, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6600 XT is 637% faster than the Quadro P1000.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 6600 XT surpassed Quadro P1000 in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	11.49	42.56
Recency	1 February 2017	30 July 2021
Cost	$375	$379
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	160 Watt