RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs Quadro P1000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P1000 and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro P1000
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
11.32

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell outperforms P1000 by a whopping 530% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking44822
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.894.83
Power efficiency20.198.48
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGP107GB202
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date7 February 2017 (8 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$375 $8,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Quadro P1000 has 22% better value for money than RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64024064
Core clock speed1493 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speed1519 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate48.611,968
Floating-point processing power1.555 TFLOPS126 TFLOPS
ROPs16192
TMUs32752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length145 mm304 mm
WidthMXM Module2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB96 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 2.1b

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA6.112.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P1000 11.32
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 71.35
+530%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P1000 4503
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 28386
+530%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
−528%
270−280
+528%
4K11
−491%
65−70
+491%

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.72
+264%
31.72
−264%
4K34.09
+287%
131.77
−287%
  • Quadro P1000 has 264% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Quadro P1000 has 287% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−483%
350−400
+483%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−509%
140−150
+509%
Dead Island 2 40−45
−525%
250−260
+525%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−525%
300−310
+525%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−483%
350−400
+483%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−509%
140−150
+509%
Dead Island 2 40−45
−525%
250−260
+525%
Far Cry 5 32
−525%
200−210
+525%
Fortnite 65−70
−515%
400−450
+515%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−517%
290−300
+517%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−518%
210−220
+518%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−515%
240−250
+515%
Valorant 100−105
−500%
600−650
+500%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−525%
300−310
+525%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−483%
350−400
+483%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
−525%
1000−1050
+525%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−509%
140−150
+509%
Dead Island 2 40−45
−525%
250−260
+525%
Dota 2 75−80
−492%
450−500
+492%
Far Cry 5 29
−521%
180−190
+521%
Fortnite 65−70
−515%
400−450
+515%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−517%
290−300
+517%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−518%
210−220
+518%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−510%
250−260
+510%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−491%
130−140
+491%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−515%
240−250
+515%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
−500%
180−190
+500%
Valorant 100−105
−500%
600−650
+500%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−525%
300−310
+525%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−509%
140−150
+509%
Dead Island 2 40−45
−525%
250−260
+525%
Dota 2 75−80
−492%
450−500
+492%
Far Cry 5 27
−530%
170−180
+530%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−517%
290−300
+517%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−515%
240−250
+515%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−525%
100−105
+525%
Valorant 100−105
−500%
600−650
+500%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
−515%
400−450
+515%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−500%
120−130
+500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
−502%
500−550
+502%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−515%
80−85
+515%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−514%
350−400
+514%
Valorant 120−130
−520%
750−800
+520%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−521%
180−190
+521%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Dead Island 2 18−20
−479%
110−120
+479%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−509%
140−150
+509%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−515%
160−170
+515%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−509%
140−150
+509%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Dead Island 2 12−14
−525%
75−80
+525%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−491%
130−140
+491%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−515%
80−85
+515%
Valorant 55−60
−503%
350−400
+503%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−507%
85−90
+507%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Dead Island 2 12−14
−525%
75−80
+525%
Dota 2 40−45
−525%
250−260
+525%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−491%
65−70
+491%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−479%
110−120
+479%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%

This is how Quadro P1000 and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 528% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 491% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.32 71.35
Recency 7 February 2017 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 600 Watt

Quadro P1000 has 1400% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 530.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P1000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 626 votes

Rate Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 16 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P1000 or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.