HD Graphics 4000 vs Quadro P1000

Place in performance ranking	384	1030
Place by popularity	not in top-100	35
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	7.28	0.13
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Gen. 7 Ivy Bridge (2011−2012)
GPU code name	GP107	Ivy Bridge
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 February 2017 (7 years ago)	23 March 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$375	no data
Current price	$301 (0.8x MSRP)	$91

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P1000 has 5500% better value for money than HD Graphics 4000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	16
Core clock speed	1493 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1519 MHz	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	1,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	unknown
Texture fill rate	59.20	20.80
Floating-point performance	1,894 gflops	33.6 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P1000 and HD Graphics 4000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x mini-DisplayPort

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.0
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.1.80
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P1000 11.54
+878%

HD Graphics 4000 1.18

Quadro P1000 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 878% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P1000 4456
+881%

HD Graphics 4000 454

Quadro P1000 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 881% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P1000 6001
+1047%

HD Graphics 4000 523

Quadro P1000 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 1047% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P1000 24240
+719%

HD Graphics 4000 2959

Quadro P1000 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 719% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P1000 4787
+897%

HD Graphics 4000 480

Quadro P1000 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 897% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P1000 30721
+715%

HD Graphics 4000 3769

Quadro P1000 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 715% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	110−120 +817%	12 −817%
Full HD	43 +291%	11 −291%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +1700%	1−2 −1700%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +1133%	3−4 −1133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20	no data
Far Cry 5	27−30	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35	no data
Forza Horizon 4	55−60	no data
Hitman 3	21−24	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50	no data
Metro Exodus	35−40 +1133%	3−4 −1133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +1700%	1−2 −1700%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +1133%	3−4 −1133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20	no data
Far Cry 5	27−30	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35	no data
Forza Horizon 4	100	no data
Hitman 3	21−24	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50	no data
Metro Exodus	35−40 +1133%	3−4 −1133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +1700%	1−2 −1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20	no data
Far Cry 5	27−30	no data
Forza Horizon 4	55−60	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7	no data
Far Cry 5	18−20	no data
Forza Horizon 4	21−24	no data
Hitman 3	14−16	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27	no data
Metro Exodus	18−20 +1700%	1−2 −1700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +1600%	1−2 −1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7	0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9	no data
Hitman 3	7−8	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	6−7	no data
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +1400%	1−2 −1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14	no data
Metro Exodus	10−12	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5	0−1