GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Quadro P1000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P1000 with GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P1000
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
11.64
+33%

P1000 outperforms GTX 650 Ti Boost by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking414493
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.773.28
Power efficiency20.014.50
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGP107GK106
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2017 (7 years ago)26 March 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$375 $169

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P1000 has 76% better value for money than GTX 650 Ti Boost.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640768
Core clock speed1493 MHz980 MHz
Boost clock speed1519 MHz1033 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt134 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rate48.6166.05
Floating-point processing power1.555 TFLOPS1.585 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs3264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm241 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
WidthMXM Module2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz6.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s144.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data4 Displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
3D Gaming-+
3D Vision-+
Optimus+-
3D Vision Live-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.75.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA6.1+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P1000 11.64
+33%
GTX 650 Ti Boost 8.75

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P1000 4474
+33%
GTX 650 Ti Boost 3364

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P1000 4787
+9%
GTX 650 Ti Boost 4390

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P1000 14371
+54.9%
GTX 650 Ti Boost 9276

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro P1000 13330
+51.7%
GTX 650 Ti Boost 8785

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro P1000 14286
+110%
GTX 650 Ti Boost 6809

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46
+53.3%
30−35
−53.3%
4K11
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.15
−44.7%
5.63
+44.7%
4K34.09
−61.4%
21.13
+61.4%
  • GTX 650 Ti Boost has 45% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 650 Ti Boost has 61% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Elden Ring 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Valorant 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Dota 2 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%
Elden Ring 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Fortnite 41
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 103
+37.3%
75−80
−37.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Valorant 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
World of Tanks 160−170
+35%
120−130
−35%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Dota 2 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+35.4%
65−70
−35.4%
Valorant 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Elden Ring 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+40%
45−50
−40%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
World of Tanks 80−85
+38.3%
60−65
−38.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Valorant 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Dota 2 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Elden Ring 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Fortnite 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Valorant 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

This is how Quadro P1000 and GTX 650 Ti Boost compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P1000 is 53% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P1000 is 38% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.64 8.75
Recency 7 February 2017 26 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 134 Watt

Quadro P1000 has a 33% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 235% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P1000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 580 votes

Rate Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 377 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.