A800 SXM4 80 GB vs Quadro NVS 55 PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNV34 B1GA100
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date31 May 2005 (19 years ago)11 August 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6912
Core clock speed250 MHz1275 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors45 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000609.1
Floating-point processing powerno data19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs2160
TMUs4432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount64 MB80 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz1593 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s2,039 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0aN/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2005 11 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 80 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 400 Watt

NVS 55 PCI has 3900% lower power consumption.

A800 SXM4 80 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 127900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 55 PCI and A800 SXM4 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 55 PCI is a workstation graphics card while A800 SXM4 80 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 55 PCI
Quadro NVS 55 PCI
NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB
A800 SXM4 80 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 55 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate A800 SXM4 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.