GeForce RTX 5060 vs Quadro NVS 5100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 5100M with GeForce RTX 5060, including specs and performance data.

NVS 5100M
2010
1 GB DDR3, 35 Watt
0.90

RTX 5060 outperforms NVS 5100M by a whopping 2158% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1141276
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.829.58
ArchitectureGT2xx (2010)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameN10P-NSGB206
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)March 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores483840
Core clock speed550 MHz2280 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2497 MHz
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data299.6
Floating-point processing powerno data19.18 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data120
Tensor Coresno data120
Ray Tracing Coresno data30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−875%
35−40
+875%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%
Fortnite 0−1 100−110
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1500%
80−85
+1500%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−875%
35−40
+875%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Valorant 30−35
−371%
140−150
+371%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−922%
230−240
+922%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%
Dota 2 14−16
−2043%
300−310
+2043%
Fortnite 0−1 100−110
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1500%
80−85
+1500%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−875%
35−40
+875%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−4200%
40−45
+4200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−833%
55−60
+833%
Valorant 30−35
−371%
140−150
+371%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%
Dota 2 14−16
−2043%
300−310
+2043%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1500%
80−85
+1500%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−875%
35−40
+875%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−833%
55−60
+833%
Valorant 30−35
−371%
140−150
+371%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 100−110

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
−2760%
140−150
+2760%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−3360%
170−180
+3360%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 18−20
Far Cry 5 4−5
−975%
40−45
+975%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1450%
30−35
+1450%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−4500%
45−50
+4500%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−140%
35−40
+140%
Valorant 5−6
−2160%
110−120
+2160%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 8−9
Far Cry 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1440p resolution and the Epic Preset, the RTX 5060 is 4500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5060 is ahead in 33 tests (57%)
  • there's a draw in 25 tests (43%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.90 20.32
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 150 Watt

NVS 5100M has 328.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 5060, on the other hand, has a 2157.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 5100M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 5100M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 5060 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M
Quadro NVS 5100M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
GeForce RTX 5060

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 5100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 474 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 5100M or GeForce RTX 5060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.