GeForce RTX 5060 vs GT 240M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 240M with GeForce RTX 5060, including specs and performance data.

GT 240M
2009
1 GB GDDR3, 23 Watt
0.54

RTX 5060 outperforms GT 240M by a whopping 3724% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1227270
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.658.53
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGT216GB206
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 June 2009 (15 years ago)March 2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores484608
Core clock speed550 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Number of transistors486 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rate8.800362.9
Floating-point processing power0.1162 TFLOPS23.22 TFLOPS
Gigaflops174no data
ROPs848
TMUs16144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 600 (DDR2), Up to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsSingle Link DVIDisplayPortDual Link DVIHDMIVGA1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA+10.1
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 240M 0.54
RTX 5060 20.65
+3724%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 240M 213
RTX 5060 8125
+3715%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12
−3650%
450−500
+3650%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−2550%
50−55
+2550%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−2550%
50−55
+2550%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Valorant 27−30
−421%
140−150
+421%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−2550%
50−55
+2550%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−1282%
230−240
+1282%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%
Dota 2 10−12
−3536%
400−450
+3536%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Metro Exodus 0−1 40−45
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1325%
55−60
+1325%
Valorant 27−30
−421%
140−150
+421%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%
Dota 2 10−12
−3536%
400−450
+3536%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1325%
55−60
+1325%
Valorant 27−30
−421%
140−150
+421%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−14200%
140−150
+14200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−5667%
170−180
+5667%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 18−20
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−3100%
30−35
+3100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−4500%
45−50
+4500%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 16−18
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−140%
35−40
+140%
Valorant 3−4
−3667%
110−120
+3667%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how GT 240M and RTX 5060 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5060 is 3650% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5060 is 14200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5060 is ahead in 33 tests (57%)
  • there's a draw in 25 tests (43%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.54 20.65
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 170 Watt

GT 240M has 639.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 5060, on the other hand, has a 3724.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5060 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 240M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 240M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 5060 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
GeForce GT 240M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
GeForce RTX 5060

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 90 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 393 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 240M or GeForce RTX 5060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.