ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs Quadro NVS 450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 450 with Radeon HD 2600 PRO, including specs and performance data.

NVS 450
2008, $163
256 MB GDDR3, 35 Watt
0.16

HD 2600 PRO outperforms NVS 450 by a whopping 213% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14781287
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.361.11
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG98RV630
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date11 November 2008 (17 years ago)28 June 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$163.14 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8 ×2120
Core clock speed480 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors210 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate1.920 ×24.800
Floating-point processing power0.0192 TFLOPS ×20.144 TFLOPS
ROPs4 ×24
TMUs4 ×28
L2 Cache16 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB ×2512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s ×216 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 450 0.16
ATI HD 2600 PRO 0.50
+213%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 450 66
Samples: 79
ATI HD 2600 PRO 211
+220%
Samples: 300

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 0.50
Recency 11 November 2008 28 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm

NVS 450 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 2600 PRO, on the other hand, has a 212.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon HD 2600 PRO is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 450 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 450 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 2600 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
Quadro NVS 450
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Radeon HD 2600 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 12 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 260 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 450 or Radeon HD 2600 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.