UHD Graphics 730 vs Quadro NVS 300M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated681
Place by popularitynot in top-10094
Power efficiencyno data19.16
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameG73Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date24 May 2006 (18 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13192
Core clock speed500 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors177 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)16 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate2.00018.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5952 TFLOPS
ROPs26
TMUs412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2006 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 90 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 16 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 800% more advanced lithography process, and 6.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 300M and UHD Graphics 730. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 300M is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics 730 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 300M
Quadro NVS 300M
Intel UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 730

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1232 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.