ATI Radeon X1950 PRO vs Quadro NVS 295

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 295 with Radeon X1950 PRO, including specs and performance data.


NVS 295
2009, $55
256 MB GDDR3, 23 Watt
0.27

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14131417
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.900.32
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameG98RV570
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 May 2009 (16 years ago)1 October 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54.50 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed540 MHz575 MHz
Number of transistors210 million330 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt66 Watt
Texture fill rate4.3206.900
Floating-point processing power0.0208 TFLOPSno data
ROPs412
TMUs812
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed695 MHz690 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.12 GB/s44.16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 295 0.27
ATI X1950 PRO 0.27

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 295 113
+0.9%
Samples: 338
ATI X1950 PRO 112
Samples: 116

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 May 2009 1 October 2006
Chip lithography 65 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 66 Watt

NVS 295 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 23% more advanced lithography process, and 187% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro NVS 295 and Radeon X1950 PRO.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 295 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X1950 PRO is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 22 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 156 votes

Rate Radeon X1950 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 295 or Radeon X1950 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.