ATI Radeon X1950 PRO vs Quadro NVS 285

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 285 with Radeon X1950 PRO, including specs and performance data.


NVS 285
2006, $28
128 MB DDR, 18 Watt
0.11

X1950 PRO outperforms NVS 285 by a whopping 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15161417
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.470.32
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameNV44 A2RV570
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 June 2006 (19 years ago)1 October 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$27.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed275 MHz575 MHz
Number of transistors75 million330 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt66 Watt
Texture fill rate1.1006.900
ROPs212
TMUs412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz690 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s44.16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-592x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model3.03.0
OpenGL2.12.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 285 0.11
ATI X1950 PRO 0.27
+145%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 285 44
Samples: 149
ATI X1950 PRO 112
+155%
Samples: 116

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.11 0.27
Recency 6 June 2006 1 October 2006
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 110 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 66 Watt

NVS 285 has 267% lower power consumption.

ATI X1950 PRO, on the other hand, has a 145% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon X1950 PRO is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 285 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 285 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X1950 PRO is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 6 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 156 votes

Rate Radeon X1950 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 285 or Radeon X1950 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.