GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro NVS 280 SD

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	1548	286
Place by popularity	not in top-100	3
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	34.26
Power efficiency	no data	18.60
Architecture	Celsius (1999−2005)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	NV18 C1	TU117
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	31 May 2005 (19 years ago)	23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	896
Core clock speed	250 MHz	1485 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1665 MHz
Number of transistors	29 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	150 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	1.000	93.24
Floating-point processing power	no data	2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	32
TMUs	4	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	AGP 8x	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	168 mm	229 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	200 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	3.2 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DMS-59	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	8.0	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	1.3	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	no data	64
1440p	no data	38
4K	no data	24

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.33
1440p	no data	3.92
4K	no data	6.21

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	31 May 2005	23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	150 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	75 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---