Quadro NVS 280 SD vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2021599
Place by popularity45not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation33.17no data
Power efficiency19.54no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameTU116NV18 C1
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date22 February 2019 (6 years ago)31 May 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed1500 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate169.91.000
Floating-point processing power5.437 TFLOPSno data
ROPs482
TMUs964
L1 Cache1.5 MBno data
L2 Cache1536 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length229 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount6 GB64 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DMS-59
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 Ti 12755
+637650%
Samples: 11670
NVS 280 SD 2
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD104no data
1440p59no data
4K39no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.68no data
1440p4.73no data
4K7.15no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 170−180 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 78 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 129 no data
Counter-Strike 2 170−180 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 71 no data
Far Cry 5 109 no data
Fortnite 247 no data
Forza Horizon 4 131 no data
Forza Horizon 5 107 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200 no data
Valorant 190−200 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 112 no data
Counter-Strike 2 170−180 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 57 no data
Dota 2 181 no data
Far Cry 5 99 no data
Fortnite 143 no data
Forza Horizon 4 122 no data
Forza Horizon 5 94 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 119 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70 no data
Metro Exodus 55 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116 no data
Valorant 190−200 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 102 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 46 no data
Dota 2 168 no data
Far Cry 5 94 no data
Forza Horizon 4 97 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 129 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62 no data
Valorant 118 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 117 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 62 no data
Metro Exodus 33 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 230−240 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 76 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27 no data
Far Cry 5 67 no data
Forza Horizon 4 77 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 75 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 56 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22 no data
Metro Exodus 21 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43 no data
Valorant 180−190 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 43 no data
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 11 no data
Dota 2 94 no data
Far Cry 5 35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 51 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 39 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 25 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 February 2019 31 May 2005
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 10 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti has an age advantage of 13 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 280 SD, on the other hand, has 1100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and Quadro NVS 280 SD. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a desktop graphics card while Quadro NVS 280 SD is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 SD
Quadro NVS 280 SD

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 9262 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Quadro NVS 280 SD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Ti or Quadro NVS 280 SD, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.