Radeon RX Vega 9 vs Quadro NVS 140M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
110M 120M 130M 135M 140M 150M 160M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2 3 5 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 9

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 140M with Radeon RX Vega 9, including specs and performance data.

NVS 140M
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 10 Watt
0.19

RX Vega 9 outperforms 140M by a whopping 2568% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
NVS 140M NVS 140M
RX Vega 9 RX Vega 9

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1469678
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.4626.03
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG86Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)26 October 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16576
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors210 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200no data
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed600 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12_1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6
−200%
18
+200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%
Valorant 24−27
−152%
60−65
+152%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−633%
85−90
+633%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Dota 2 9−10
−378%
40−45
+378%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−160%
13
+160%
Valorant 24−27
−152%
60−65
+152%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Dota 2 9−10
−378%
40−45
+378%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−60%
8
+60%
Valorant 24−27
−152%
60−65
+152%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Valorant 1−2
−2500%
24−27
+2500%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Fortnite 22
+0%
22
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Fortnite 16
+0%
16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 9
+0%
9
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
High

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how NVS 140M and RX Vega 9 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 9 is 200% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega 9 is 2500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 9 performs better in 26 tests (46%)
  • there's a draw in 31 tests (54%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.19 5.07
Recency 9 May 2007 26 October 2017
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

NVS 140M has 50% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 9, on the other hand, has a 2568% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 471% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX Vega 9 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 140M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 140M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 9 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

NVS 140M Quadro NVS 140M
vs
FX 360M Quadro FX 360M
RX Vega 9 Radeon RX Vega 9
vs
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
NVS 140M Quadro NVS 140M
vs
FX 570M Quadro FX 570M
NVS 140M Quadro NVS 140M
vs
9300M GS GeForce 9300M GS
NVS 140M Quadro NVS 140M
vs
7600 LE GeForce 7600 LE
NVS 140M Quadro NVS 140M
vs
FX 5800 FX 5800
NVS 140M Quadro NVS 140M
vs
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
NVS 140M Quadro NVS 140M
vs
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
NVS 140M Quadro NVS 140M
vs
RTX 6000 Passive RTX 6000 Passive
NVS 140M Quadro NVS 140M
vs
R9 280X2 R9 280X2
NVS 140M Quadro NVS 140M
vs
T1000 T1000
NVS 140M Quadro NVS 140M
vs
T550 Mobile T550 Mobile
NVS 140M Quadro NVS 140M
vs
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU Pro 19-Core GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 12 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 140M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 32 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 9 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 140M or Radeon RX Vega 9, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.