T1000 vs Quadro NVS 140M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 140M with T1000, including specs and performance data.

NVS 140M
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 10 Watt
0.18

T1000 outperforms 140M by a whopping 9500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1450329
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.4527.84
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG86TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)6 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16896
Core clock speed400 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1395 MHz
Number of transistors210 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20078.12
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS2.5 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs856
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cache16 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data156 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.17.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 140M 0.18
T1000 17.28
+9500%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 140M 78
Samples: 298
T1000 7643
+9699%
Samples: 678

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6
−850%
57
+850%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3800%
35−40
+3800%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−620%
35−40
+620%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3800%
35−40
+3800%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2433%
75−80
+2433%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−620%
35−40
+620%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
Valorant 24−27
−464%
140−150
+464%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−1792%
220−230
+1792%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3800%
35−40
+3800%
Dota 2 9−10
−9344%
850−900
+9344%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2433%
75−80
+2433%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−620%
35−40
+620%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1180%
64
+1180%
Valorant 24−27
−464%
140−150
+464%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3800%
35−40
+3800%
Dota 2 9−10
−9344%
850−900
+9344%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2433%
75−80
+2433%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−620%
35−40
+620%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−600%
35
+600%
Valorant 24−27
−464%
140−150
+464%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−1800%
35−40
+1800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−8350%
160−170
+8350%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4500%
45−50
+4500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 27−30

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−127%
30−35
+127%
Valorant 1−2
−10400%
100−110
+10400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 57
+0%
57
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 77
+0%
77
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how NVS 140M and T1000 compete in popular games:

  • T1000 is 850% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T1000 is 10400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1000 performs better in 27 tests (44%)
  • there's a draw in 35 tests (56%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.18 17.28
Recency 9 May 2007 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 50 Watt

NVS 140M has 400% lower power consumption.

T1000, on the other hand, has a 9500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 140M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 140M is a mobile workstation graphics card while T1000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
Quadro NVS 140M
NVIDIA T1000
T1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 10 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 140M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 72 votes

Rate T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 140M or T1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.