GeForce MX570 vs Quadro NVS 120M

Place in the ranking	1439	354
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.83	41.38
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	G72	GA107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 June 2006 (18 years ago)	May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	7	2048
Core clock speed	450 MHz	832 MHz
Boost clock speed	450 MHz	1155 MHz
Number of transistors	112 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	1.800	73.92
Floating-point processing power	no data	4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	40
TMUs	4	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	MXM-III	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	700 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	11.2 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	3.0	6.6
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 120M 0.12

GeForce MX570 14.87
+12292%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 120M 46

GeForce MX570 5735
+12367%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−1050%

21−24
+1050%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1033%	30−35 +1033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1050%	21−24 +1050%
Hitman 3	4−5 −600%	27−30 +600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −850%	75−80 +850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1100%	45−50 +1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −179%	75−80 +179%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1033%	30−35 +1033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1050%	21−24 +1050%
Hitman 3	4−5 −600%	27−30 +600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −850%	75−80 +850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1100%	45−50 +1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −289%	35−40 +289%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −179%	75−80 +179%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1033%	30−35 +1033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1050%	21−24 +1050%
Hitman 3	4−5 −600%	27−30 +600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −850%	75−80 +850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1100%	45−50 +1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −289%	35−40 +289%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −179%	75−80 +179%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	8−9
Hitman 3	6−7 −200%	18−20 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1100%

24−27
+1100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	7−8

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−550%

12−14
+550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

+0%

40−45

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Hitman 3	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 1400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GeForce MX570 is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.12	14.87
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	2 GB
Chip lithography	90 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	25 Watt

NVS 120M has 150% lower power consumption.

GeForce MX570, on the other hand, has a 12291.7% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 120M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 120M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce MX570 is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.