Radeon RX Vega 7 vs Quadro NVS 110M
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 503 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 10 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 10.89 |
| Architecture | Curie (2003−2013) | Vega (2017−2021) |
| GPU code name | G72M | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 June 2006 (18 years ago) | 7 January 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Current price | $99 | $387 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 7 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 3 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 300 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 112 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 1.200 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Quadro NVS 110M and Radeon RX Vega 7 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR-3 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 600 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 4.8 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | no data |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | no data |
| OpenCL | N/A | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 June 2006 | 7 January 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 110M and Radeon RX Vega 7. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro NVS 110M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX Vega 7 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
