Radeon R9 M360 vs Quadro M620

Place in performance ranking	509	612
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.49	0.07
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	GM107	Tropo
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	13 January 2017 (7 years ago)	5 May 2015 (9 years ago)
Current price	$1958	$1140

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro M620 has 600% better value for money than R9 M360.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	512
Compute units	no data	8
Core clock speed	1018 MHz	900 MHz
Boost clock speed	977 MHz	925 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	31.26	29.60
Floating-point performance	no data	947.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M620 and Radeon R9 M360 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	no data	PCIe 3.0
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity	no data	1
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	no data	-
Enduro	no data	-
FreeSync	no data	1
HD3D	no data	+
PowerTune	no data	+
DualGraphics	no data	1
TrueAudio	no data	-
ZeroCore	no data	+
Switchable graphics	no data	1
Optimus	+	no data
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	DirectX® 12
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.1.126	no data
Mantle	no data	+
CUDA	5.0	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M620 7.24
+52.1%

R9 M360 4.76

Quadro M620 outperforms Radeon R9 M360 by 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro M620 2798
+52.3%

R9 M360 1837

Quadro M620 outperforms Radeon R9 M360 by 52% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	23 +64.3%	14−16 −64.3%
4K	16 +60%	10−12 −60%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−12

+57.1%

7−8
−57.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +75%	12−14 −75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 +66.7%	12−14 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +66.7%	21−24 −66.7%
Hitman 3	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 +66.7%	12−14 −66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +64.3%	14−16 −64.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +55.6%	18−20 −55.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +75%	12−14 −75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 +66.7%	12−14 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +66.7%	21−24 −66.7%
Hitman 3	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 +66.7%	12−14 −66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +64.3%	14−16 −64.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	19 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +55.6%	18−20 −55.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +66.7%	21−24 −66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +64.3%	14−16 −64.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +55.6%	18−20 −55.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

20−22
+66.7%

12−14

−66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +62.5%	8−9 −62.5%
Hitman 3	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

+71.4%

7−8
−71.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Hitman 3	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%