Radeon R6 (Mullins) vs Quadro M620

Place in performance ranking	510	1155
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.49	no data
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	GCN 1.1 (2014)
GPU code name	GM107	Mullins
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	13 January 2017 (7 years ago)	29 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Current price	$1958	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	128
Core clock speed	1018 MHz	500 MHz
Boost clock speed	977 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,870 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	31.26	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M620 and Radeon R6 (Mullins) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	no data
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model	5.0	no data
OpenGL	4.5	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.1.126	no data
CUDA	5.0	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M620 7.25
+1033%

R6 (Mullins) 0.64

Quadro M620 outperforms Radeon R6 (Mullins) by 1033% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro M620 22120
+880%

R6 (Mullins) 2258

Quadro M620 outperforms Radeon R6 (Mullins) by 880% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	23 +1050%	2−3 −1050%
4K	16 +1500%	1−2 −1500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−33
+900%

3−4

−900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 +1011%	9−10 −1011%
Battlefield 5	230−240 +995%	21−24 −995%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Far Cry 5	180−190 +1025%	16−18 −1025%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Forza Horizon 4	350−400 +900%	35−40 −900%
Hitman 3	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +983%	12−14 −983%
Metro Exodus	210−220 +1005%	18−20 −1005%
Red Dead Redemption 2	220−230 +1000%	20−22 −1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 +971%	7−8 −971%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−105 +1011%	9−10 −1011%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 +1011%	9−10 −1011%
Battlefield 5	230−240 +995%	21−24 −995%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Far Cry 5	180−190 +1025%	16−18 −1025%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Forza Horizon 4	350−400 +900%	35−40 −900%
Hitman 3	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +983%	12−14 −983%
Metro Exodus	210−220 +1005%	18−20 −1005%
Red Dead Redemption 2	220−230 +1000%	20−22 −1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 +971%	7−8 −971%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−105 +1011%	9−10 −1011%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 +1011%	9−10 −1011%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Far Cry 5	180−190 +1025%	16−18 −1025%
Forza Horizon 4	350−400 +900%	35−40 −900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +983%	12−14 −983%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 +971%	7−8 −971%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−105 +1011%	9−10 −1011%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

220−230
+1000%

20−22

−1000%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	150−160 +971%	14−16 −971%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 +991%	10−12 −991%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +1025%	4−5 −1025%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +977%	12−14 −977%
Hitman 3	65−70 +983%	6−7 −983%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Metro Exodus	90−95 +1025%	8−9 −1025%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +1000%	5−6 −1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +983%	6−7 −983%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33
+900%

3−4

−900%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +983%	6−7 −983%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +1000%	5−6 −1000%
Hitman 3	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +1025%	4−5 −1025%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +1025%	4−5 −1025%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +1025%	8−9 −1025%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +1025%	4−5 −1025%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%