Arc Pro B50 vs Quadro M620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M620 with Arc Pro B50, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M620
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
6.26

Pro B50 outperforms M620 by a whopping 376% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking600194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.43
Power efficiency16.8134.32
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameGM107BMG-G21
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date11 January 2017 (8 years ago)5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122048
Core clock speed756 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed977 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate31.26332.8
Floating-point processing power1 TFLOPS10.65 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs32128
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.4
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro M620 6.26
Arc Pro B50 29.82
+376%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M620 2766
Samples: 376
Arc Pro B50 13186
+377%
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
−362%
120−130
+362%
4K10
−350%
45−50
+350%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.91
4Kno data7.76

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−355%
150−160
+355%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−364%
65−70
+364%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−362%
60−65
+362%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 27−30
−348%
130−140
+348%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−355%
150−160
+355%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−364%
65−70
+364%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−376%
100−105
+376%
Fortnite 40−45
−363%
190−200
+363%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−367%
140−150
+367%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
−375%
95−100
+375%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−362%
60−65
+362%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−340%
110−120
+340%
Valorant 70−75
−311%
300−310
+311%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 27−30
−348%
130−140
+348%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−355%
150−160
+355%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
−359%
500−550
+359%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−364%
65−70
+364%
Dota 2 50−55
−372%
250−260
+372%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−376%
100−105
+376%
Fortnite 40−45
−363%
190−200
+363%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−367%
140−150
+367%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
−375%
95−100
+375%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−358%
110−120
+358%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−362%
60−65
+362%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−362%
60−65
+362%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−340%
110−120
+340%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−374%
90−95
+374%
Valorant 70−75
−311%
300−310
+311%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
−348%
130−140
+348%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−364%
65−70
+364%
Dota 2 50−55
−372%
250−260
+372%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−376%
100−105
+376%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−367%
140−150
+367%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−362%
60−65
+362%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−340%
110−120
+340%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−350%
45−50
+350%
Valorant 70−75
−311%
300−310
+311%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
−363%
190−200
+363%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−362%
60−65
+362%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−362%
240−250
+362%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−362%
180−190
+362%
Valorant 75−80
−367%
350−400
+367%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
−358%
55−60
+358%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−362%
60−65
+362%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−369%
75−80
+369%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
−364%
65−70
+364%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−372%
85−90
+372%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Valorant 30−35
−371%
160−170
+371%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Dota 2 24−27
−358%
110−120
+358%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%

This is how Quadro M620 and Arc Pro B50 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Pro B50 is 362% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Pro B50 is 350% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.26 29.82
Recency 11 January 2017 5 September 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 70 Watt

Quadro M620 has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro B50, on the other hand, has a 376.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Pro B50 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M620 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Arc Pro B50 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M620
Quadro M620
Intel Arc Pro B50
Arc Pro B50

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 212 votes

Rate Quadro M620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Arc Pro B50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M620 or Arc Pro B50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.