UHD Graphics P630 vs Quadro M600M

Place in the ranking	599	569
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	12.89	29.58
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	GM107	Comet Lake GT2
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	18 August 2015 (9 years ago)	13 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	192
Core clock speed	837 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	876 MHz	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	14.02	28.80
Floating-point processing power	0.6728 TFLOPS	0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	3
TMUs	16	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x1
Width	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	+	1.1
CUDA	5.0	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M600M 5.57

UHD Graphics P630 6.39
+14.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M600M 2150

UHD Graphics P630 2465
+14.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

+0%

18−21

+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10
+350%

2−3

−350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −11.1%	40−45 +11.1%
Hitman 3	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +338%	8−9 −338%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +75%	27−30 −75%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −11.1%	40−45 +11.1%
Hitman 3	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +338%	8−9 −338%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +75%	27−30 −75%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −11.1%	40−45 +11.1%
Hitman 3	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +338%	8−9 −338%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +75%	27−30 −75%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−6.7%

16−18
+6.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1
Far Cry 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Hitman 3	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −11.1%	40−45 +11.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11
+400%

2−3

−400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Hitman 3	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Metro Exodus	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
+200%

2−3

−200%

This is how Quadro M600M and UHD Graphics P630 compete in popular games:

A tie in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro M600M is 500% faster.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics P630 is 13% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro M600M is ahead in 28 tests (97%)
UHD Graphics P630 is ahead in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.57	6.39
Recency	18 August 2015	13 May 2020
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	15 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has a 14.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics P630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M600M is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics P630 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.