Radeon 780M vs Quadro M6000

Place in performance ranking	168	283
Place by popularity	not in top-100	56
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	6.21	no data
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)	RDNA 3
GPU code name	GM200	Phoenix
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	21 March 2015 (9 years ago)	5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$4,199.99	no data
Current price	$1792 (0.4x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	768
Core clock speed	988 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1114 MHz	3000 MHz
Number of transistors	8,000 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	213.9	139.2
Floating-point performance	6,844 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M6000 and Radeon 780M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	384 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	317.4 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	5.2	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M6000 30.57
+66.6%

Radeon 780M 18.35

Quadro M6000 outperforms Radeon 780M by 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro M6000 11805
+66.5%

Radeon 780M 7088

Quadro M6000 outperforms Radeon 780M by 67% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	55−60 +52.8%	36 −52.8%
1440p	30−35 +42.9%	21 −42.9%
4K	21−24 +50%	14 −50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65
+53.8%

−53.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +61.3%	30−35 −61.3%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +58.3%	60−65 −58.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 +62.2%	35−40 −62.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +61.3%	31 −61.3%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +62.8%	40−45 −62.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 +63.3%	45−50 −63.3%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +54.8%	80−85 −54.8%
Hitman 3	55−60 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +64.9%	97 −64.9%
Metro Exodus	100−105 +63.9%	60−65 −63.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 +56.9%	50−55 −56.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 +56.3%	64 −56.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +58.5%	41 −58.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +61.3%	30−35 −61.3%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +58.3%	60−65 −58.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 +62.2%	35−40 −62.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +45.8%	24 −45.8%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +62.8%	40−45 −62.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 +63.3%	45−50 −63.3%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +54.8%	80−85 −54.8%
Hitman 3	55−60 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +64.4%	70−75 −64.4%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +42.9%	21 −42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 +56.9%	50−55 −56.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 +60.4%	53 −60.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +63%	46 −63%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +60.7%	55−60 −60.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +61.3%	30−35 −61.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 +62.2%	35−40 −62.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +52.2%	23 −52.2%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +62.8%	40−45 −62.8%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +54.8%	80−85 −54.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 +60.4%	53 −60.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 +63%	46 −63%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +55.2%	29 −55.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +50%	18 −50%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85
+56.9%

50−55

−56.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +57.1%	35−40 −57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +57.9%	18−20 −57.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +50%	16−18 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +52.2%	21−24 −52.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +48.1%	27 −48.1%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
Hitman 3	35−40 +59.1%	21−24 −59.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +62.2%	35−40 −62.2%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +61.8%	30−35 −61.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +56.3%	32 −56.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +50%	20 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50
+50%

30−33

−50%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%
Hitman 3	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +50%	20−22 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +60%	15 −60%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +63.6%	10−12 −63.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +60%	24−27 −60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +50%	20−22 −50%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +58.8%	16−18 −58.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%