GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile vs Quadro M5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M5000 with GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M5000
2015
8 GB 256-bit, 150 Watt
24.40
+59.9%

M5000 outperforms GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by an impressive 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking233349
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.21no data
Power efficiency11.2014.01
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGM204GP107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date29 June 2015 (9 years ago)3 January 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,856.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048768
Core clock speed861 MHz1493 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHz1620 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rate132.977.76
Floating-point processing power4.252 TFLOPS2.488 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs12848

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type256 BitGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz7 GB/s
Memory bandwidthUp to 211 GB/s112 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Syncno data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data
Anselno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA5.2+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85−90
+51.8%
56
−51.8%
1440p35−40
+40%
25
−40%
4K27−30
+58.8%
17
−58.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p33.61no data
1440p81.63no data
4K105.81no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Far Cry 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+0%
62
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 56
+0%
56
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+0%
33
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Dota 2 92
+0%
92
+0%
Far Cry 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Fortnite 76
+0%
76
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+0%
57
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55
+0%
55
+0%
Metro Exodus 19
+0%
19
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 52
+0%
52
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+0%
47
+0%
World of Tanks 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Dota 2 86
+0%
86
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 43
+0%
43
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 39
+0%
39
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+0%
26
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 54
+0%
54
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 29
+0%
29
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 32
+0%
32
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 7
+0%
7
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
+0%
17
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9
+0%
9
+0%

This is how Quadro M5000 and GTX 1050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M5000 is 52% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M5000 is 40% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro M5000 is 59% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 41 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.40 15.26
Recency 29 June 2015 3 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro M5000 has a 59.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M5000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Quadro M5000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 78 votes

Rate Quadro M5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 856 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.