Arc 8-Core iGPU vs Quadro M6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M2000 M3000 SE M4000 M5000 M5000 SE M6000 M6000 24 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M6000 with Arc 8-Core iGPU, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M6000
2015, $4,200
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
28.06
+76.3%

M6000 outperforms 8-Core iGPU by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking228370
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.41no data
Power efficiency8.64no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Xe LPG (2023−2025)
GPU code nameGM200Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2015 (11 years ago)14 December 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,199.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30728
Core clock speed988 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1114 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate213.9no data
Floating-point processing power6.844 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs192no data
L1 Cache1.1 MB1.5 MB
L2 Cache3 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount12 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1653 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth317.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA5.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
+71.4%
35
−71.4%
1440p27−30
+58.8%
17
−58.8%
4K24−27
+71.4%
14
−71.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p70.00no data
1440p155.56no data
4K175.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 111
+0%
111
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 40
+0%
40
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
+0%
25
+0%
Metro Exodus 28
+0%
28
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 49
+0%
49
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+0%
24
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
+0%
11
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 32
+0%
32
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
+0%
9
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how Quadro M6000 and Arc 8-Core iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M6000 is 71% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M6000 is 59% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro M6000 is 71% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 57 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 28.06 15.92
Recency 21 March 2015 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

Quadro M6000 has a 76% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc 8-Core iGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro M6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Core iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M6000 is a workstation graphics card while Arc 8-Core iGPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
PRO WX 9100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
RX Vega 11 Efficient Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
PRO W7800 Radeon PRO W7800
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
Radeon 840M Radeon 840M
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
R8 M365DX Radeon R8 M365DX
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
HD 8470D Radeon HD 8470D
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
P102-101 P102 101

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.5 156 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 108 votes

Rate Arc 8-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M6000 or Arc 8-Core iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.