Arc 8-Core iGPU vs Quadro M5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M6-8Q M60-1Q M60-2Q M60-4A M60-8Q Quadro M3000 SE Quadro M4000 Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000 SE Tesla M6 Tesla M60
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7-Core iGPU 7-Cores iGPU 8-Core iGPU Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M5000 with Arc 8-Core iGPU, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M5000
2015
8 GB 256-bit, 150 Watt
21.29
+33.1%

M5000 outperforms 8-Core iGPU by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking281354
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.25no data
Power efficiency11.45no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameGM204Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date29 June 2015 (10 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,856.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20488
Core clock speed861 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1038 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rate132.9no data
Floating-point processing power4.252 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs128no data
L1 Cache768 KB1.5 MB
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type256 Bitno data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1653 MHzno data
Memory bandwidthUp to 211 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortno data
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Syncno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA5.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
+28.6%
35
−28.6%
1440p21−24
+23.5%
17
−23.5%
4K18−20
+28.6%
14
−28.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p63.49no data
1440p136.05no data
4K158.72no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 111
+0%
111
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 26
+0%
26
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
+0%
25
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 19
+0%
19
+0%
Metro Exodus 28
+0%
28
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+0%
48
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16
+0%
16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+0%
24
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
+0%
11
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 32
+0%
32
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
+0%
9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how Quadro M5000 and Arc 8-Core iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M5000 is 29% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M5000 is 24% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro M5000 is 29% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 21.29 16.00
Recency 29 June 2015 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

Quadro M5000 has a 33.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc 8-Core iGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro M5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Core iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M5000 is a workstation graphics card while Arc 8-Core iGPU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Quadro M5000
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Arc 8-Core iGPU
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
vs
Quadro P2200 Quadro P2200
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
GTX 1650 Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
vs
L4 L4
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
GTX 960 OEM 960 OEM
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
R9 390X2 390X2
Tesla M6 Tesla M6
vs
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Cores iGPU (Arc)
Tesla M60 Tesla M60
vs
GT 545 OEM 545 OEM
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
vs
FX 2800M 2800M
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
HD Graphics 4000 4000
Tesla K8 Tesla K8
vs
RX Vega 11 Vega 11
Quadro K420 Quadro K420
vs
RX 6400 6400
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
vs
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
vs
RX 9070 GRE 9070 GRE

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 82 votes

Rate Quadro M5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 95 votes

Rate Arc 8-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M5000 or Arc 8-Core iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.