Radeon RX 7700 XT vs Quadro M6000 24 GB

Place in performance ranking	166	33
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.38	41.29
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)	RDNA 3
GPU code name	GM200	Navi 32
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	5 March 2016 (8 years ago)	25 August 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$4,999	$449
Current price	$2104 (0.4x MSRP)	$443 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7700 XT has 667% better value for money than M6000 24 GB.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	3456
Core clock speed	988 MHz	1700 MHz
Boost clock speed	1114 MHz	2544 MHz
Number of transistors	8,000 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	245 Watt
Texture fill rate	285.2	549.5
Floating-point performance	6,844 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz	18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	317.4 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	5.2	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M6000 24 GB 30.79

RX 7700 XT 57.68
+87.3%

Radeon RX 7700 XT outperforms Quadro M6000 24 GB by 87% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

M6000 24 GB 11890

RX 7700 XT 22275
+87.3%

Radeon RX 7700 XT outperforms Quadro M6000 24 GB by 87% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	95−100 −89.5%	180 +89.5%
1440p	50−55 −106%	103 +106%
4K	30−35 −96.7%	59 +96.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

100−105

−93%

193
+93%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −94.1%	165 +94.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	95−100 −89.5%	180 +89.5%
Battlefield 5	95−100 −92.6%	180−190 +92.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 −98.2%	100−110 +98.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 −97.5%	158 +97.5%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −98.2%	100−110 +98.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75 −98.6%	130−140 +98.6%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −98.6%	278 +98.6%
Hitman 3	55−60 −104%	110−120 +104%
Horizon Zero Dawn	200−210 −95.5%	391 +95.5%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −92.9%	130−140 +92.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 −95%	110−120 +95%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	210−220 −89.5%	398 +89.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −87.7%	120−130 +87.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 −97.3%	148 +97.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	75−80 −98.7%	149 +98.7%
Battlefield 5	95−100 −92.6%	180−190 +92.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 −98.2%	100−110 +98.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −88.6%	132 +88.6%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −98.2%	100−110 +98.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75 −98.6%	130−140 +98.6%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −91%	190−200 +91%
Hitman 3	55−60 −104%	110−120 +104%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 −101%	240−250 +101%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −90%	76 +90%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 −95%	110−120 +95%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	170−180 −96.5%	334 +96.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150−160 −96.7%	295 +96.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −87.7%	120−130 +87.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −102%	121 +102%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 −88.6%	132 +88.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 −98.2%	100−110 +98.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −87.7%	122 +87.7%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −98.2%	100−110 +98.2%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −92.5%	231 +92.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −96.4%	216 +96.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	150−160 −91.3%	287 +91.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 −97.6%	168 +97.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −87.7%	120−130 +87.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
−95%

110−120

+95%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −90.8%	120−130 +90.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75 −88.6%	130−140 +88.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −96%	98 +96%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 −102%	101 +102%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −102%	90−95 +102%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −100%	80 +100%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −96.3%	157 +96.3%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −97%	197 +97%
Hitman 3	40−45 −103%	80−85 +103%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 −90%	171 +90%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −91.4%	134 +91.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 −93%	193 +93%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 −100%	120 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −100%	60−65 +100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55

−96%

95−100
+96%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 −117%	65−70 +117%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −100%	50−55 +100%
Hitman 3	24−27 −104%	45−50 +104%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −105%	80−85 +105%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −88.6%	66 +88.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −97.8%	89 +97.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −93.3%	58 +93.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −96.7%	59 +96.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −95.2%	40−45 +95.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −100%	36 +100%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −111%	35−40 +111%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −91.4%	134 +91.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −106%	103 +106%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −97.8%	89 +97.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −88.9%	30−35 +88.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33

−90%

55−60
+90%

This is how M6000 24 GB and RX 7700 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7700 XT is 89% faster in 1080p
RX 7700 XT is 106% faster in 1440p
RX 7700 XT is 97% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	30.79	57.68
Recency	5 March 2016	25 August 2023
Cost	$4999	$449
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	245 Watt