Radeon RX 7700S vs Quadro M5000M

Place in the ranking	308	109
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	12.54	27.38
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GM204	Navi 33
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	18 August 2015 (9 years ago)	4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1,536	2048
Core clock speed	975 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1051 MHz	2500 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	93.60	320.0
Floating-point processing power	2.995 TFLOPS	20.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	96	128
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Portable Device Dependent
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	5.2	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M5000M 18.21

RX 7700S 39.78
+118%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M5000M 6999

RX 7700S 15287
+118%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

M5000M 11845

RX 7700S 37918
+220%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

M5000M 9228

RX 7700S 24246
+163%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	86 −39.5%	120 +39.5%
1440p	27−30 −133%	63 +133%
4K	21−24 −124%	47 +124%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −175%	88 +175%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −136%	85−90 +136%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −81%	100−110 +81%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −153%	81 +153%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −136%	85−90 +136%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −166%	202 +166%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 −113%	100−110 +113%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −93.9%	95−100 +93.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −81.4%	75−80 +81.4%
Valorant	70−75 −115%	150−160 +115%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −81%	100−110 +81%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −113%	68 +113%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −136%	85−90 +136%
Dota 2	65−70 −36.9%	89 +36.9%
Far Cry 5	60−65 −3.2%	65 +3.2%
Fortnite	95−100 −76.5%	170−180 +76.5%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −120%	167 +120%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 −113%	100−110 +113%
Grand Theft Auto V	65−70 −105%	133 +105%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −93.9%	95−100 +93.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −61.6%	200−210 +61.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −81.4%	75−80 +81.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 −152%	140−150 +152%
Valorant	70−75 −115%	150−160 +115%
World of Tanks	210−220 −27.4%	270−280 +27.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −81%	100−110 +81%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −90.6%	61 +90.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −136%	85−90 +136%
Dota 2	65−70 −90.8%	120−130 +90.8%
Far Cry 5	60−65 −55.6%	95−100 +55.6%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −89.5%	144 +89.5%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 −113%	100−110 +113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −61.6%	200−210 +61.6%
Valorant	70−75 −115%	150−160 +115%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	27−30 −139%	67 +139%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 −131%	67 +131%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 −6.1%	170−180 +6.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −150%	40−45 +150%
World of Tanks	120−130 −102%	250−260 +102%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −97.3%	70−75 +97.3%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −87.5%	30−33 +87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −174%	120−130 +174%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −100%	92 +100%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 −128%	65−70 +128%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −110%	85−90 +110%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −180%	70−75 +180%
Valorant	45−50 −174%	120−130 +174%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Dota 2	30−35 −119%	68 +119%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −119%	68 +119%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −154%	30−35 +154%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −139%	120−130 +139%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −117%	24−27 +117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −119%	68 +119%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −156%	45−50 +156%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +113%	8 −113%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Dota 2	30−35 −155%	75−80 +155%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −157%	55−60 +157%
Fortnite	21−24 −171%	55−60 +171%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −77.8%	48 +77.8%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −164%	35−40 +164%
Valorant	21−24 −214%	65−70 +214%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2

30−35

+0%

30−35

+0%

This is how M5000M and RX 7700S compete in popular games:

RX 7700S is 40% faster in 1080p
RX 7700S is 133% faster in 1440p
RX 7700S is 124% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the M5000M is 113% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7700S is 260% faster.

All in all, in popular games: