Quadro T600 Mobile vs M5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M5000 with Quadro T600 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M5000
2015
8 GB 256-bit, 150 Watt
24.37
+47.9%

Quadro M5000 outperforms T600 Mobile by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking208307
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.58no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGM204TU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date29 June 2015 (9 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,856.99 no data
Current price$823 (0.3x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048896
Core clock speed861 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1038 MHz1400 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate132.974.76
Floating-point performance4,252 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M5000 and Quadro T600 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type256 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6612 MHz10000 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 211 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDVI-I DP DP DP DP 3-pin StereoNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Syncno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model56.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA5.27.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
+47.1%
51
−47.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+36.4%
30−35
−36.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+42.9%
27−30
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+38.9%
50−55
−38.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+36.4%
30−35
−36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+41.5%
53
−41.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+42.9%
75−80
−42.9%
Hitman 3 45−50
+40.6%
30−35
−40.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+43.9%
65−70
−43.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+41.3%
45−50
−41.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+41.5%
53
−41.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+44.2%
50−55
−44.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+36.4%
30−35
−36.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+42.9%
27−30
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+38.9%
50−55
−38.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+36.4%
30−35
−36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+42.9%
49
−42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+42.9%
75−80
−42.9%
Hitman 3 45−50
+40.6%
30−35
−40.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+43.9%
65−70
−43.9%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+45.5%
55−60
−45.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+41.3%
45−50
−41.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+41%
39
−41%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+44.2%
52
−44.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+44.2%
50−55
−44.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+36.4%
30−35
−36.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+42.9%
27−30
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+38.9%
50−55
−38.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+44.4%
45
−44.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+42.9%
75−80
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+42.9%
28
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+44.2%
50−55
−44.2%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+35%
20−22
−35%
Hitman 3 27−30
+35%
20−22
−35%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+36.4%
30−35
−36.4%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+45.2%
30−35
−45.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+40.6%
30−35
−40.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+45.2%
30−35
−45.2%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+40.6%
30−35
−40.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Hitman 3 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+36.4%
21−24
−36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

This is how Quadro M5000 and T600 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M5000 is 47% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.37 16.48
Recency 29 June 2015 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 40 Watt

The Quadro M5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T600 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M5000 is a workstation card while Quadro T600 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Quadro M5000
NVIDIA Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro T600 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 60 votes

Rate Quadro M5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 35 votes

Rate Quadro T600 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.